The Risk of Equal Positive Liberty (in Polish)

Article Sidebar

PDF (Język Polski) Full text (Język Polski)
Published: Sep 19, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.49.2016.924
Keywords:
political philosophy ethics liberty freedom equality redistribution F. A. von Hayek I. Berlin G. C. MacCallum

Main Article Content

Andrzej Stoiński
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Abstract

The article deals with selected problems related to the postulates of equalizing the level of positive liberty. The classic understanding of individual freedom as negative freedom, identified with the lack of compulsion, can be opposed to the so-called positive liberty. The latter notion is usually defined in terms of ability, which suggests that there is a relation between the concept of freedom and the concept of power. The postulate of equality with regard to the ‘freedom to’ would occasionally justify social redistribution of goods. The cases of voluntary and compulsory donation are considered in the text the aim of which is to picture the consequences resulting from the compulsory expansion of the scope of positive liberty. Moreover, an attempt to compare the significance of both types of liberty, with a special emphasis on the moral context, has also been made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Stoiński, Andrzej. 2016. “The Risk of Equal Positive Liberty (in Polish)”. Diametros, no. 49 (September):121-38. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.49.2016.924.
Issue
No. 49 (2016)
Section
Articles

By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.

Author Biography

Andrzej Stoiński, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Andrzej Stoiński, PhDUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynDepartment of Philosophyul. K. Obitza 2.E-mail: andrzej.stoinski@gmail.com

Share |
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Arystoteles [2005] – Arystoteles, Polityka, tłum. L. Piotrowicz, Wrocław 2005.

Berlin [2000] – I. Berlin, Cztery eseje o wolności, tłum. D. Lachowska, Poznań 2000.

Brighouse [2007] – H. Brighouse, Sprawiedliwość, tłum. S. Królak, Warszawa 2007.

Dahl [1957] – R.A. Dahl: The Concept of Power, Behavioral Science, (2/3) 1957, s. 201–215.

Hayek [2006] – F.A. von Hayek, Konstytucja wolności, tłum. J. Stawiński, Warszawa 2006.

Hegel [1990] – G.W.F. Hegel, Encyklopedia nauk filozoficznych, tłum. Ś.F. Nowicki, Warszawa 1990.

Herbut [1997] – Leksykon filozofii klasycznej, red. J. Herbut, Lublin 1997.

Legutko [2007] – R. Legutko, Traktat o wolności, Gdańsk 2007.

Locke [1992] – J. Locke, Dwa traktaty o rządzie, tłum. Z. Rau, Warszawa 1992.

Kant [2005] – I. Kant, Ugruntowanie metafizyki moralności, tłum. P. Zarychta, Kraków 2005.

Krąpiec [1997] – M.A. Krąpiec, Natura ludzkiej wolności, [w:] Wolność we współczesnej kulturze, „Człowiek w Kulturze” (9) 1997, s. 30.

Kwaśnicki [2000] – W. Kwaśnicki, Historia myśli liberalnej, Warszawa 2000.

MacCallum [1967] – G.C. Jr. MacCallum, Negative and Positive Freedom, „Philosophical Review” (76) 1967, s. 312–334.

Rothbard [2010] – M.N. Rothbard, Etyka wolności, tłum. J. Woziński, J.M. Fijor, Warszawa 2010.

Young [2003] – H.P. Young, Sprawiedliwy podział, tłum. J. Haman i M. Jasiński, Warszawa 2003.