Justice in Health Care from the Perspectives of the Various Theories of Liberal Egalitarianism (in Polish)

Maciej Juzaszek

About author

Maciej Juzaszek
Collegium Invisibile Scientific Society,
Jagiellonian University,
Faculty of Law and Administration,
Department of Legal Theory,
12 Bracka St.
Pl-31-005 Kraków
e-mail: maciej.juzaszek@uj.edu.pl

Abstract


This article aims at presenting to the Polish reader a number of different conceptions of justice in health care, represented by the advocates of liberal egalitarianism. The author has given an overview of the most relevant, influential and representative theories, held by the liberal egalitarians, in order to present the way in which, in a democratic state, both just health care and respect for freedom and moral equality of individuals can be provided. The following issues will be discussed: John Rawls’s theory of justice, Norman Daniels’s theory of justice including health possibilities, varieties of luck egalitarianism, Ronald Dworkin’s “prudent insurance” ideal, Elizabeth Anderson’s democratic egalitarianism, a family of theories of egalitarianism of all kinds of luck and the theory of Shlomi Segall.

Full Text:

PDF (In Polish)


References


  1. E. Anderson, What Is the Point of Equality?, „Ethics” (109/2) 1999, s. 287–337.
  2. R. Arneson, Equal opportunity, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2002, dostępe na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equal-opportunity/ [15.06.2014].
  3. R. Arneson, Luck Egalitarianism. A Primer, [w:] C. Knight, Z. Stemplowska (red.), Distributive Justice and Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.
  4. R. Arneson, Egalitarianism, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2013, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/ [15.06.2014].
  5. A. Cappelen, O. Norheim, Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach, „Journal of medical ethics” (31/8) 2005, s. 476–480.
  6. N. Daniels, Just Health Care, Cambridge University Press, New York 1985.
  7. N. Daniels, Justice, Health and Health Care, 2001, s. 1–20, dostępne na: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/benchmark/ndaniels/pdf/justice_health.pdf [15.06.2014].
  8. N. Daniels, Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly, Cambridge University Press, New York 2008.
  9. N. Daniels, Setting Limits Fairly: Learning to Share Resource for Health, Oxford University Press, New York 2008.
  10. N. Daniels, Social and Individual Responsibility for Health, [w:] C. Knight, Z. Stemplowska (red.), Distributive Justice and Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.
  11. N. Daniels, Justice and Access to Health Care, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2013, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-healthcareaccess/ [15.06.2014].
  12. N. Daniels, J.E. Sabin, Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” (26) 1997, s. 303–350.
  13. R. Dworkin, Justice in the distribution of health care, „McGill LJ” (38/4) 1992, s. 883–898.
  14. R. Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 2000.
  15. D. Fried, Equality and rights in medical care, „Hastings Center Report” (6) 1976, s. 29–34.
  16. S. Gosepath, Equality, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2007, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/equality/ [15.06.2014].
  17. M. Jantos, Pojęcie sprawiedliwości w bioetyce, [w:] Etyczne problemy zarządzania w ochronie zdrowia, J. Hartman, Z. Zalewski (red.), Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2013.
  18. C. Knight, Luck egalitarianism, „Philosophy Compass” (8/10) 2013, s. 924–934.
  19. K. Kolasa, Optymalna alokacja zasobów w ochronie zdrowia, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2012.
  20. Lamont, Ch. Favor, Distributive Justice, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2013, źródło: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-distributive/ (dostęp: 15.06.2014).
  21. K. Lippert-Rasmussen, Justice and Bad Luck, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2014, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ justice-bad-luck/ [15.06.2014].
  22. O. McLeod, Desert, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2008, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/desert/ [15.06.2014].
  23. D. Nelkin, Moral Luck, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2013, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-luck/ [15.06.2014].
  24. M. Nussbaum, Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice, „Feminist economics” (9.2–3) 2003, s. 33–59.
  25. M. Nussbaum, Creating capabilities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 2011.
  26. J. Rawls, Teoria sprawiedliwości, tłum. A. Romaniuk, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 2001.
  27. J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, PWN, Warszawa 2009.
  28. J. Rawls, Liberalizm polityczny, tłum. A. Romaniuk, PWN, Warszawa 2012.
  29. I. Roybens, The Capability approach, „Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” 2011, dostępne na: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/ [15.06.2014].
  30. S. Segall, Health, Luck and Justice, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2010.
  31. A. Sen, Commodities and capabilities, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
  32. A. Sen, Why health equity?, „Health economics” (11.8) 2002, s. 659–666.
  33. A. Sen, Human Rights and Capabilities, „Journal of Human Development” (6/2) 2005, s. 151–166.
  34. A. Sen, The Idea of Justice, Allen Lane, London 2009.
  35. G. Sreenivasan, Health care and equality of opportunity, „Hastings Cen- ter Report” 37(2) 2009, s. 21–31.
  36. T. Żuradzki, Równość: przegląd problemu, Interdyscyplinarne Centrum Etyki UJ, Kraków 2010, dostępne na: http://www.incet.uj.edu.pl [15.06.2014].

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.42.2014.684

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/684
Polish abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/684/pl
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/684/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.