“Radical Enlightenment” – Peripheral, Substantial, or the Main Face of the Trans-Atlantic Enlightenment (1650-1850)

Jonathan Israel

About author

Jonathan Israel
Modern European History Professor
Institute for Advanced Study
School of Historical Studies
Einstein Drive
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
USA
e-mail: jisrael@ias.edu

Short biography: Jonathan Israel was raised and educated in London, studied at Cambridge and Oxford and, since 2001, has lived in the United States, as Professor of Modern History at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton. Prior to 1993 when he began his project on the Enlightenment, he specialized on the Dutch Golden Age and prior to 1974 on seventeenth-century Spanish America. His books on the Enlightenment are: Radical Enlightenment (2001); Enlightenment Contested (2006); A Revolution of the Mind (2010); Democratic Enlightenment (2011); Revolutionary Ideas (2014) and the volume edited together with Martin Mulsow, Radikalaufklärung (2014).

Abstract


“Radical Enlightenment” and “moderate Enlightenment” are general categories which, it has become evident in recent decades, are unavoidable and essential for any valid discussion of the Enlightenment broadly conceived (1650-1850) and of the revolutionary era (1775-1848). Any discussion of the Enlightenment or revolutions that does not revolve around these general categories, first introduced in Germany in the 1920s and taken up in the United States since the 1970s, cannot have any validity or depth either historically or philosophically. “Radical Enlightenment” was neither peripheral to the Enlightenment as a whole, nor dominant, but rather the “other side of the coin” an inherent and absolute opposite, always present and always basic to the Enlightenment as a whole. Several different constructions of “Radical Enlightenment” have been proposed by the main innovators on the topic – Leo Strauss, Henry May, Günter Mühlpfordt, Margaret Jacob, Gianni Paganini, Martin Mulsow, and Jonathan Israel – but, it is argued here, the most essential element in the definition is the coupling, or linkage, of philosophical rejection of religious authority (and secularism - the elimination of theology from law, institutions, education and public affairs) with theoretical advocacy of democracy and basic human rights.

Full Text:

PDF


References


  1. K. Baker, “Review essay,” H-France Forum 9 (1), 3, 2014 (electronic edition).
  2. R. Buel, J. Barlow: American Citizen in a Revolutionary World, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore 2011.
  3. J. H. Burns, “Jeremy Bentham: from Radical Enlightenment to Philosophic Radicalism,” The Bentham Newsletter 8, 1984, pp. 4-14.
  4. A. Comte, Rapport à la Société Positiviste, par la commission chargée d’examiner la nature et le plan du nouveau gouvernement révolutionnaire de la République Française, Paris 1848.
  5. J.-A.-N. de Caritat, marquis de Condorcet, Tableau historique des progrés de l’esprit humain. Projets, Esquisse, Fragments et Notes (1772-1794), ed. by J.-P. Schandeler and P. Crépel, Institut national d’études démographiques, Paris 2004.
  6. M. Curran, Atheism, Religion and Enlightenment in pre-revolutionary Europe, Woodbridge, Suffolk 2012.
  7. N. Davidson, How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?, Haymarket Books, Chicago 2012.
  8. E. Foner, Tom Paine and Revolutionary America, Oxford University Press, New York 1976 (reprinted 2005).
  9. F. Guizot, De la Démocratie en France, V. Masson, Paris 1849.
  10. H. Heine, On the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007.
  11. P.-H. Thiry, baron d’Holbach, La Politique naturelle ou Discours sur les vrais principles du gouvernement, 2 vols., “Londres” [Amsterdam] 1773.
  12. J. Israel, “L’histoire intellectuelle des Lumières et de la Révolution: une incursion critique,” La Lettre Clandestine 19, 2011, pp. 173-226.
  13. J. Israel, Democratic Enlightenment. Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights, 1750-1790, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
  14. J. Israel, “Leibniz’s Theodicy as a Critique of Spinoza and Bayle – and Blueprint for the Philosophy Wars of the Eighteenth Century” in: L. M. Jorgensen, S. Newlands (eds.), New Essays on Leibniz’s Theodicy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014, pp. 233-44.
  15. J. Israel, Revolutionary Ideas. An Intellectual History of the French Revolution from “The Rights of Man” to Robespierre, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2014.
  16. J. Israel, “Radikalaufklärung: Entstehung und Bedeutung einer fundamentalen Idee” in: Israel and Mulsow [2014] pp. 234-75.
  17. J. Israel, M. Mulsow, “Was ist Radikalaufklärung? – Eine aktuelle Debatte” in: J. Israel, M. Mulsow (eds.), Radikalaufklärung, Suhrkamp, Berlin 2014, pp. 7-19.
  18. S. Jacoby, Freethinkers. A History of American Secularism, Henry Holt and Co., New York 2004.
  19. J. Keane, Tom Paine. A Political Life, Bloomsbury, London 1995.
  20. A. de Lamartine, Histoire des Girondins, 4 vols., Ed. Furne/Coquebert, Paris 1847.
  21. V. Le Ru, Subversives Lumières. L’ “Encyclopédie” comme machine de guerre, CNRS Editions, Paris 2007.
  22. A. Lilti, “Comment écrit-on l’histoire intellectuelle des Lumières? Spinozisme, radicalisme et philosophie,” Annales. Histoire, sciences sociales 64, 2009, pp. 171-206.
  23. D. Lutz, “The Relative Influence of European Writers on Late Eighteenth-Century American Political Thought,” The American Political Science Review 78, 1984, pp. 189-97.
  24. H. F. May, The Enlightenment in America, Oxford University Press, New York 1976.
  25. A. McKenna, “Pierre Bayle: moralisme et anthropologie” in: A. McKenna and G. Paganini (eds.), Pierre Bayle dans la République des Lettres: philosophie, religion, critique, H. Champion, Paris 2004.
  26. McMahon – D. McMahon, Enemies of the Enlightenment: The French Counter-Enlightenment and the Making of Modernity, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
  27. D. H. Meyer, The Democratic Enlightenment, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York 1976.
  28. G. Mori, Bayle philosophe, H. Champion, Paris 1999.
  29. J. Muglioni, Auguste Comte. Un philosophe pour notre temps, Kimé, Paris 1995.
  30. G. Mühlpfordt, “Ein kryptoradikaler Reformprofessor der Universität Erfurt” in: Mühlpfordt and Weiss [2009] pp. 297-324.
  31. G. Mühlpfordt and U. Weiss, “Kryptoradikalität als Aufgabe der Forschung” in: Mühlpfordt and Weiss [2009] pp. 9-16.
  32. G. Mühlpfordt and U. Weiss (eds.), Kryptoradicalität in der Frühneuzeit, Steiner, Stuttgart 2009.
  33. M. Mulsow, “Radikalaufklärung, moderne Aufklärung und die Dynamik der Moderne” in: Israel and Mulsow [2014] pp. 203-33.
  34. G. Nash, The Unknown American Revolution. The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America, Penguin Books, London 2005.
  35. G. Paganini, “L’Apport des courants sceptiques à la naissance des Lumières radicales” in: C. Secrétan, T. Dagron and L. Bove (eds.), Qu’est-ce-que Les Lumières “radicales”? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’âge classique, Editions Amsterdam, Paris 2007.
  36. E. Palmer, An Inquiry relative to the Moral and Political Improvement of the Human Species. An Oration, New York 1797.
  37. E. Palmer, Principles of Nature. A Development of the Moral Causes of Happiness and Misery among the Human Species, New York 1801.
  38. M. D. Peterson, Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation. A Biography, Oxford University Press, New York 1970.
  39. L. J. Reynolds, European Revolutions and the American Literary Renaissance, Yale University Press, New Haven 1988.
  40. S. B. Smith, Spinoza’s Book of Life, Yale University Press, New Haven 2003.
  41. M. Stephens, Imagine There’s No Heaven. How Atheism Helped Create the Modern World, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2014.
  42. F. Stjernfelt, “The Emergence of the ‘Radical Enlightenment’ in Humanist Scholarship,” delivered at the Brussels Conference The Radical Enlightenment. The Big Picture, May 2013.
  43. L. Strauss, Spinoza’s Critique of Religion [English translation (1965), original edition Die Religionskritik Spinozas als Grundlage seiner Bibelwissenschaft. Untersuchungen zu Spinozas Theologisch-Politischen Traktat, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin 1930], University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1967.
  44. K. Walters, The American Deists. Voices of Reason and Dissent in the early Republic, Lawrence, Kansas 1992.
  45. K. Walters, Revolutionary Deists. Early America’s Rational Infidels, Amherst, New York 2011.
  46. G. Wood, Empire of Liberty. A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815, Oxford University Press, New York 2009.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.40.2014.630

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/630
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/630/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.