Abandoning Truth is not a Solution. A Discussion with Richard Rorty

Marcin Kilanowski

About author

Marcin Kilanowski
The Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
Faculty of Law and Administration
Department of Theory of Law and State
ul. Władysława Bojarskiego 3
87-100 Toruń

E-mail: markil@umk.pl

Abstract


Richard Rorty suggests that we should stop looking for something common to us all, for universal justifi cations and truth. Rorty argues that focusing on a single truth sooner or later serves those who claim that there is a proper, true model of living. In the end, they use violence and cause pain, as they are driven by the idea that everyone should accept their truth. In this article I shall argue that such reasoning is not justifi ed and whether we are universalists or constructivists, our actions may be the same and cause pain. At the same time, having the same beliefs will not stop us from acting differently. What matters is how we use a particular concept in accordance with our interests and not the concept itself. I shall also argue that dialog can help to prevent violence and that while Rorty is right, there are also a number of problems with that proposition.

Full Text:

PDF


References


  1. Auxier R., Hahn L. (eds) (2010), Philosophy of Richard Rorty. Library of living philosophers, Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago.
  2. Berlin I. (1991), “Two Concepts of Liberty,” [in:] Liberty, D. Miller (ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 33–57.
  3. Berlin I. (1998), The Sense of Reality, Studies in Ideas and Their History, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
  4. Brandom R. (2000), Rorty and His Critics, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  5. Curtis W. (2015), Defending Rorty: Pragmatism and Liberal Virtue, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  6. Deliege R. (2001), The Untouchables of India, Berg 3PL, Oxford.
  7. Deva S. (2012), Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business, Routledge, New York.
  8. Engel P. (2007), What’s the Use of Truth?, Columbia University Press, New York.
  9. Fromm E. (1994), Escape from Freedom, Henry Holt Company Inc, New York.
  10. Gebel E. (1946/1983), “Letter to Robert Scholl,” trans. A.R. Schultz, [in:] I. Scholl, The White Rose. Munich, 1942–1943, University Press of New England, Lebanon, New Hempshire: 138–147.
  11. Guignon Ch., Hiley D. (2003), Richard Rorty (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Gross N. (2008), Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  13. Habermas J. (1981), Theory of Communicative Action, trans. T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston.
  14. Hanser R. (2012), A Noble Treason: The Story of Sophie Scholl and the White Rose Revolt Against Hitler, Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
  15. Kaiser R. (1987), “A Fifth Gospel, Almost Chief Seattle’s Speech(es): American Origin and European Reception,” [in:] Indians and Europe: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays, Ch. Feest (ed), Heredot im Rader Verlag, Aachen: 505–526.
  16. Kennedy D. (2004), “Human Rights, Part of the Problem?” [in:] D. Kennedy, The Dark Sides of Virtue, Reassessing International Humanitarianism, Princeton University Press, Princeton & Oxford.
  17. Kilanowski M. (2013), Ku wolności jako odpowiedzialności. Dewey, Rorty, Habermas o nowej jakości w demokracji, Wydawnictwo UMK, Toruń.
  18. Kilanowski M. (2015), “Towards a Responsible and Rational Ethical Discussion – A Critique of Putnam’s Pragmatic Approach,” [in:] Philosophy of Hilary Putnam, Library of living philosophers, R.E. Auxier, D.R. Anderson, L.E. Hahn (eds), Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago: 827–862.
  19. Kilanowski M. (2017), “What Kind of Politics Do We Need? Toward Freedom as Responsibility in Habermas’s and Rorty’s Visions of Democracy,” Kultura i Edukacja – Culture and Education 116 (2): 50–68.
  20. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013).
  21. Lamb R. (2009), “For and Against Ownership: William Godwin’s Theory of Property,” The Review of Politics 71 (2): 275–302.
  22. Nałkowska Z. (2000), Medallions, trans. D. Kuprel, Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL.
  23. Ortega y Gasset J. (1994), The Revolt of the Masses, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
  24. Osiatyński W. (2009), Human Rights and Their Limits, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  25. Pable A. (2015), “Integrating Rorty and (Social) Constructivism: A View from Harrisian Semiology,” Social Epistemology 29 (1): 95–117.
  26. Proudhon P.-J. (2008), What Is Property?: An Inquiry Into the Principle of Right and of Government, Forgotten Books, London.
  27. United States, Congress, House, Committee on Un-American Activities (1946), Publications Relating to Various Aspects of Communism 15 (1), Washington.
  28. Rorty R. (2008), An Ethics for Today, Columbia University Press, New York.
  29. Rorty R. (1992), “A Pragmatist View of Rationality and Cultural Difference,” Philosophy East and West 42 (4): 581–596.
  30. Rorty R. (1989), Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  31. Rorty R. (1996), Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski, J. Niź nik, T. Sanders (eds), Praeger Publishers, Westport.
  32. Rorty R. (1991), Essays on Heidegger and Others, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  33. Rorty R. (1993), “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality,” [in:] R. Rorty, On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures, S. Shute, S. Hurley (eds), Basic Books, New York: 111–134.
  34. Rorty R. (1997), “Is it Desirable to Love Truth?” [in:] R. Rorty, Truth, Politics and ‘Post-Modernism’, Van Gorcum, Assen: 11–33.
  35. Rorty R. (1991), Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  36. Rorty R. (2015), “Putnam, Pragmatism and Parmenides,” [in:] Philosophy of Hilary Putnam, R.E. Auxier, D.R. Anderson, L.E. Hahn (eds), Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago: 863–881.
  37. Shklar J. (1976), Legalism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
  38. Srivastava B.N. (1997), Manual Scavenging in India: A Disgrace to the Country, Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.1243

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/1243
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/1243/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.