Heraclitus does not announce, nor does he hide, but he indicates

Main Article Content

Leopold Hess


The subject of the article is a comparison of the work of Heraclitus with the utterances of Delphic oracle. The author analyzes the character of those utterances, pointing to their “two-layeredness”, i.e. to their having two meanings: one litteral – apparent and the other hidden – proper. The proper meaning is allegoric and is in such a relation to the litteral as the latter is to the sign (a material text). To settle for the litteral meaning is a mistake that makes it impossible understand the prophecy properly. Some essential fragments of Heraclitus have a similar character – they also have both an apparent sense (often paradoxical) and a proper, hidden sense. One can guess that the philosopher intentionally made his work resemble Pythia’s utterances to give it a unique status. The pattern [sign/apparent meaning = apparent meaning/hidden meaning] can be also suitable for Heraclitus’s vision of the world (the phenomena are in such a relation to the Logos as the litteral sense of the prophecy is to the allegoric sense). The relation that appears in each of these three areas is a peculiar kind of “indicating”.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hess, L. (2005). Heraclitus does not announce, nor does he hide, but he indicates. Diametros - An Online Journal of Philosophy, (6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.6.2005.162


Bywater [1877] – I. Bywater, Heracliti Ephesii reliquiae, London 1877.

Colli [1991] – G. Colli, Narodziny filozofii, tłum. S. Kasprzysiak, Kraków 1991.

Conche [1991] – M. Conche, Héraclite. Fragments, Paris 1991.

Diels-Kranz [1934] – H. Diels, W. Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, t. I, Berlin 1934.

Diogenes Laertios [1984] – Diogenes Laertios, Żywoty sławnych filozofów, tłum. I. Krońska, Warszawa 1984.

Gadamer [1990] – H. G. Gadamer, Symbol i alegoria, tłum. M. Łukasiewicz, w: Symbole i symbolika, red. M. Słowiński, Warszawa 1990.

Heraclitus [2005] – Homeric Problems. Alegoriae Homericae, Boston 2005.

Herodot [2002] – Herodot, Dzieje, tłum. S. Hammer, Warszawa 2002.

Hölscher [1968] – U. Hölscher, Anfängliches Fragen, Göttingen 1968.

Hölscher [1974] – U. Hölscher, Paradox, simile, and gnomic utterance in Heraclitus, tłum. M. R. Cosgrove, P. D. Mourelatos, w: The Pre–Socratics, red. P. D. Mourelatos, New York 1974.

Kahn [1979] – Ch. H. Kahn, The art and thought of Heraclitus, Cambridge 1979.

Kirk [1954] – G. S. Kirk, Heraclitus. The cosmic fragments, Cambridge 1954.

Krokiewicz [1948] – A. Krokiewicz, Heraklit, „Kwartalnik Filozoficzny“ (17) 1948, s. 1-15.

Marcovich [1967] – M. Marcovich, Heraclitus, Editio maior, Merida 1967.

Minar [1939] – E. L. Minar, The Logos of Heraclitus, „Classical Philology” (34) 1939, s. 323- 341.

Miodońska-Brookes [1974] – E. Miodońska-Brookes i in., Zarys poetyki, Warszawa 1974.

Mrówka [2004] – K. Mrówka, Heraklit. Fragmenty: nowy przekład i komentarz, Warszawa 2004.

Narecki [1999] – K. Narecki, Logos we wczesnej myśli greckiej, Lublin 1999.

Oświęcimski [1989] – S. Oświęcimski Zeus daje tylko znak, Apollo wieszczy osobiście: starożytne wróżbiarstwo greckie, Wrocław 1989.

Plotyn [1959] – Plotyn, Enneady, tłum. A. Krokiewicz, t. II, Warszawa 1959.

Sextus Empiryk [1998] – Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos, Oxford 1998. Snell [1926] – B. Snell, Die Sprache Heraklits, „Hermes” (61) 1926, s. 353-381.

Tarán [1986] – L. Tarán, The first fragment of Heraclitus, „Illinois Classical Studies” (11) 1986, s. 1-15.

Todorov [1990] – T. Todorov, Wstęp do symboliki, tłum. K. Falicka, w: Symbole i symbolika, red. M. Słowiński, Warszawa 1990.

Trier [1976] – R. A. Trier, Archaic Logic: Symbol and Structure In Heracleitus, Parmenides and Empedocles, The Hague 1976.

Wheelwright [1959] – P. Wheelwright, Heracleitus, Princeton N.J. 1959.