A Kantian Defense of Abortion Rights with Respect for Intrauterine Life

Main Article Content

Bertha Alvarez Manninen

Abstract

In this paper, I appeal to two aspects of Immanuel Kant’s philosophy – his metaphysics and ethics – in defense of abortion rights. Many Kantian pro-life philosophers argue that Kant’s second principle formulation of the categorical imperative, which proscribes treating persons as mere means, applies to human embryos and fetuses. Kant is clear, however, that he means his imperatives to apply to persons, individuals of a rational nature. It is important to determine, therefore, whether there is anything in Kant’s philosophy that permits regarding embryos and fetuses as persons, since they lack the capacity for sentience (at least until mid-gestation), let alone rational thought. In the first part of the paper, I will illustrate why there are difficulties maintaining, from a Kantian perspective, that conception marks the genesis of a new person. Even granting that embryos and fetuses are persons, however, this alone would not entail the moral impermissibility of abortion rights, mainly because prohibiting abortion, and compelling women to gestate, violates the formula of humanity against them. Developing this thesis encompasses the second part of my essay. Finally, although I argue that Kant’s philosophy lends strong support to abortion rights, this does not thereby entail that it allows for the complete dehumanization of the human fetus. By appealing to the writings of Kantian scholar Allen Wood, I will argue that a fetus’ status as a potential person does render it worthy of some degree of respect and moral value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Manninen, Bertha Alvarez. 2014. “A Kantian Defense of Abortion Rights With Respect for Intrauterine Life”. Diametros, no. 39 (March), 70-92. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.39.2014.565.
Section
Special topic – Kant’s Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Practical Ethics
Author Biography

Bertha Alvarez Manninen, Arizona State University

Bertha Alvarez Manninen, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
School of Humanities, Arts, and Cultural Studies

Arizona State University
New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences
P.O. Box 37100; Mail Code: 2151
Phoenix, AZ 85069-7100
USA

Email: bertha.manninen@asu.edu

Share |

References

Bordo [1993] – S. Bordo, Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body, University of California Press, Los Angeles 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Cannold [1998] – L. Cannold. The Abortion Myth: Feminism, Morality, and the Hard Choices Women Make, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Casper [1998] – M. Casper, The Making of the Unborn Patient: A Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Drakulic [1999] – S. Drakulic, A Novel about the Balkans, Penguin Putnam, New York 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Dworkin [1993] – R. Dworkin, Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom, Random House Press, New York 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Feldman [1998] – S. Feldman, From Occupied Bodies to Pregnant Persons: How Kantian Ethics Should Treat Pregnancy and Abortion, [in:] J. Kneller, S. Axinn (eds.), Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy, State University of New York Press 1998, pp. 265–282.
View in Google Scholar

Feldt, Jennings [2002] – G. Feldt, C. Jennings, Behind Every Choice is a Story, University of North Texas, Denton 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Hursthouse [1991] – R. Hursthouse, Virtue Theory and Abortion, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” (20) 1991, pp. 223–246.
View in Google Scholar

Kain [2009] – P. Kain, Kant’s Defense of Human Moral Status, “Journal of the History of Philosophy” (47) 1995, pp. 59–101.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1781] – I. Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood, Cambridge University Press, New York 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1785] – I. Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor and J. Timmermann, Cambridge University Press, New York 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1793] – I. Kant, Religion within the Bounds of Mere Reason, trans. A. Wood and G. di Giovanni, Cambridge University Press, New York 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1797] – I. Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals, trans, M. Gregor, Cambridge University Press, New York 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Kant [1799] – I. Kant, Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, trans. P. Ferguson and P. Guyer, Cambridge University Press, New York 2011.
View in Google Scholar

LaFleur [1990] – W. LaFleur, Contestation and Consensus: The Morality of Abortion in Japan, “Philosophy East and West” (40) 1990, pp. 529-542.
View in Google Scholar

LaFleur [1992] – W. LaFleur, Liquid Life: Abortion and Buddhism in Japan, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1992.
View in Google Scholar

Little [1999] – M.O. Little, Abortion, Intimacy, and the Duty to Gestate, “Ethical Theory and Moral Practice” (2) 1999, pp. 295–312.
View in Google Scholar

Little [2012] – M.O. Little, The Morality of Abortion, [in:] B. Steinbock, J. Arras, A.J. London (eds.), Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine, McGraw Hill, New York 2012, pp. 492–500.
View in Google Scholar

Myer, Williamson [2001] – K. Myers, P. Williamson, Race Talk: The Perpetuation of Racism through Private Discourse, “Race and Society” (4) 2001, pp. 3–26.
View in Google Scholar

Novak [2003] – M. Novak, The Stem Cell Slide: Be Alert to the Beginnings of Evil, [in:] M. Ruse, C. Pynes (ed.), The Stem Cell Controversy: Debating the Issues, Prometheus Book, New York 2003, pp. 101–105.
View in Google Scholar

Oduncu [2003] – F.S. Oduncu, Stem Cell Research in Germany: Ethics of Healing vs. Human Dignity, “Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy” (6) 2003, pp. 5–16.
View in Google Scholar

Overall [1993] – C. Overall, Human Reproduction: Principles, Practices, and Policies, Oxford University Press, New York 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Poppema [1996] – S. Poppema, Why I am an Abortion Doctor, Prometheus Books, New York 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Regan [1979] – D. Regan, Rewriting Roe v. Wade, “Michigan Law Review” (77) 1979, pp. 1569–1646.
View in Google Scholar

Sagoff [2005] – M. Sagoff, Extracorporal Embryos and Three Conceptions of the Human, “American Journal of Bioethics” (5) 2005, pp. 52–54.
View in Google Scholar

Smith [1988] – B. Smith, Buddhism and Abortion in Contemporary Japan: Mizuko Kuyo and the Confrontation with Death, “Japanese Journal of Religious Studies” (15) 1988, pp. 21–42.
View in Google Scholar

Steuter, Wills [2010] – E. Steuter, D. Wills, The Vermin Have Struck Again: Dehumanizing the Enemy in Post-9/11 Media Representations, “Media, War, and Conflict” (3) 2010, pp. 152–167.
View in Google Scholar

Thomson [1971] – J. J. Thomson, A Defense of Abortion, “Philosophy and Public Affairs” (1) 1971, pp. 47–66.
View in Google Scholar

Underwood [1999] – M. Underwood, Strategies of Survival: Women, Abortion, and Popular Religion in Contemporary Japan, “Journal of the American Academy of Religion” (67) 1999, pp. 739–768.
View in Google Scholar

Warren [1973] – M.A. Warren, On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, “The Monist” (57) 1973, pp. 43–61.
View in Google Scholar

Wilson [2009] – J. Wilson, Mourning the Unborn Dead: A Buddhist Ritual Comes to America, Oxford University Press, New York 2009.
View in Google Scholar

Wood [1998] – A. Wood, Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature, “Supplemental Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society” (72) 1998, pp. 189–210.
View in Google Scholar