Is epistemic safety threatened by Frankfurt cases? A reply to Kelp

Main Article Content

Domingos Faria
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-7839

Abstract

I intend to argue that the counterexamples inspired by the Frankfurt-type cases against the necessity of an epistemic safety condition for knowledge are not plausible. The epistemic safety condition for knowledge is a modal condition recently supported by Sosa (2007) and Pritchard (2015), among others, and can be formulated as follows: (SC) If S knows that p on basis B, then S’s true belief that p could not have easily been false on basis B. I will try to argue that the safety condition, expressed in (SC), is still necessary for knowledge and that, therefore, epistemic safety is not threatened by Frankfurt-type cases. In particular, I want to show that Kelp’s counterexamples are ineffective against (SC).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
FARIA, D. Is epistemic safety threatened by Frankfurt cases? A reply to Kelp. Diametros, p. 1-6, 10 Apr. 2020.
Section
Articles
Share |

References

Comesaña J. (2013), “Safety and Epistemic Frankfurt Cases,” [in:] Virtuous Thoughts: The Philosophy of Ernest Sosa, J. Turri (ed.), Springer, Dordrecht: 165–178.

Engel M. (1992), “Is Epistemic Luck Compatible with Knowledge?,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (2): 59–75.


DOI

Frankfurt H. (1969), “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,” Journal of Philosophy 66 (23): 829–839.


DOI

Goldman A. (1976), “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge,” Journal of Philosophy 73 (20): 771–791.


DOI

Goldman A. (1979), “What Is Justified Belief?,” [in:] Justification and Knowledge, G.S. Pappas (ed.), D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht: 1–23.

Kelp C. (2009), “Knowledge and Safety,” Journal of Philosophical Research 34: 21–31.


DOI

Kelp C. (2016), “Epistemic Frankfurt Cases Revisited,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 53 (1): 27–37.

Kelp C. (2019), Good Thinking: A Knowledge First Virtue Epistemology, Routledge, New York.


DOI

Neta R., Rohrbaugh G. (2004), “Luminosity and the Safety of Knowledge,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4): 396–406.


DOI

Pritchard D. (2005), Epistemic Luck, Oxford University Press, Oxford.


DOI

Pritchard D. (2015), “Anti-Luck Epistemology and the Gettier Problem,” Philosophical Studies 172 (1): 93–111.


DOI

Pritchard D. (2016), “Epistemic Risk,” Journal of Philosophy 113 (11): 550–571.


DOI

Sosa E. (2007), A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Volume I, Oxford University Press, Oxford.