Is God Morally Indifferent? The Problem of Inference according to David Hume

Main Article Content

Milena Jakubiak

Abstract

The article is devoted to an analysis of David Hume’s position on God’s benevolence in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. The focal point is the problem of inference and the accompanying arguments concerning the relations between good and evil, as well as the four circumstances in which evil enters the world. In the conclusion, I discuss the hypothesis of moral indifference as Hume’s skeptical voice in the debate on the possibility of inferring the moral attributes of God on the basis of experience.

Author Biography

Milena Jakubiak

Milena Jakubiak
Instytut Filozofii US
ul. Krakowska 71-79
71-004 Szczecin
E-mail: milena.m.jakubiak@gmail.com

References

Andre S. (1993), Was Hume an Atheist?, „Hume Studies” 1 (19): 141–166.
Butler J. (2011), The Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed to the Constitution and Course of Nature to Which are Added, Two Brief Dissertations, Kindle Edition.
Davis J.W. (1987), Going Out the Window: A Comment on Tweyman, „Hume Studies” 1 (13): 86–97.
Dye J. (1992), Demea’s Departure, „Hume Studies” 18 (2): 467–482.
Gale R.M. (1993), On the Nature and the Existence of God, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gaskin J.C.A. (1988), Hume’s Philosophy of Religion, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands.
Grzeliński A. (2009), Kategoria zła w empiryzmie Davida Hume’a, [w:] Koncepcje i problemy filozofii zła, R. Wiśniewski i M. Jaranowski (red.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, Toruń: 13–33.
Hochfeldowa A. (1962), Dawida Hume’a „Dialogi o religii naturalnej”, [w:] D. Hume, Dialogi o religii naturalnej. Naturalna historia religii wraz z dodatkami, PWN, Warszawa: VII–LIII.
Howard-Snyder D., Bergmann M., Rowe W.L. (2005), An Exchange on the Problem of Evil, [w:] God and the Problem of Evil, William L. Rowe (red.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford: 124–158.
Hubaczek K. (2011), Bóg a zło. Problematyka teodycealna w filozofi i analitycznej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
Hume D. (1962), Dialogi o religii naturalnej. Naturalna historia religii wraz z dodatkami, tłum. A. Hochfeldowa, PWN, Warszawa.
Hume D. (2005), Badania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego wraz z apendyksami, tłum. D. Misztal i T. Sieczkowski, Zielona Sowa, Kraków.
Hume D. (2007), Rozdz. 7. Czwarta obiekcja, tłum. A. Grzeliński, „Nowa Krytyka” 20–21: 325–332.
Judycki S. (2009), Wszechmoc i istnienie, „Diametros” 21: 30–62.
Kraay K.J. (2003), Philo’s Argument for Divine Amorality Reconsidered, „Hume Studies” 2 (29): 283–294.
Leibniz G.W. (2001), Teodycea. O dobroci Boga, wolności człowieka i pochodzeniu zła, tłum. M. Frankiewicz, PWN, Warszawa.
Logan B. (1996), Why Hume Wasn’t an Atheist: A Reply to Andre, „Hume Studies” 22 (1): 193–202.
Malebranche N. (2003), Dialogi o metafizyce i religii. Dialogi o śmierci, tłum. P. Rak, ANTYK, Kęty.
Malebranche N. (2011), Poszukiwanie prawdy, tłum. M. Frankiewicz, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
Nathan G. (1987), Comments on Tweyman and Davis, „Hume Studies” 13 (1): 98–103.
O’Connor D. (2001), Hume on Religion, Routledge, London/New York.
O’Connor D. (2003), Skepticism and Philo’s Atheistic Preferences, „Hume Studies” 29 (2): 267–282.
Pike N. (2005), Hume on Evil, [w:] God and the Problem of Evil, W.L. Rowe (red.), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
Sieczkowski T. (2007), Qui pro quo Dialogów, czyli pytanie o status teologii naturalnej, „Nowa Krytyka” 20–21: 265–301.
Spryszak P. (2005), O „teizmie empirycznym w Dialogach o religii naturalnej Dawida Hume’a,„Studia z Historii Filozofii” 6 (2): 59–80.
Tweyman S. (1987), Hume’s Dialogues on Evil, „Hume Studies” 13 (1): 74–85.
Wadia P.S. (1987), Commentary on Professor Tweyman’s “Hume on Evil”, „Hume Studies” 13 (1): 104–112.
Yandell K.E. (1990), Hume’s “Inexplicable Mystery”. His Views on Religion, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
JAKUBIAK, M. Is God Morally Indifferent? The Problem of Inference according to David Hume. Diametros, v. 58, n. 58, p. 34-48, 19 dez. 2018.
Section
Articles