Philosophical Usage of the History of Philosophy – A Proposal for a Functional Typology

Maria Marcinkowska-Rosół

About author

Maria Marcinkowska-Rosół, dr hab.
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan
Institute of Classical Philology
ul. Fredry 10
Pl-61-701 Poznań
E-mail: marmarro@amu.edu.pl

Abstract


The article deals with the question of the value of the history of philosophy for philosophical research. In the first part, it proposes a classification of possible functions realized by references to the philosophical tradition in a philosophical treatise. The proposed typology is meant as a practical tool for identifying and comparing the usage of the past in philosophical texts of any historical period. The second part of the paper illustrates how the classification can be employed by applying it to determine the functions of Aristotle’s discussions of the pre-Socratic doctrines in Metaphysics A.

Full Text:

PDF


References


  1. R. Barney, History and Dialectic (Metaphysics A 3, 983a24-984b8), [in:] Aristotle's Metaphysics Alpha.
  2. Symposium Aristotelicum, Carlos Steel (ed.), with a new critical edition of the Greek text by Oliver Primavesi, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012, p. 69–104.
  3. Aristotele, Il libro primo della ‘Metafisica’, a cura di E. Berti e C. Rossitto, Roma – Bari 1993.
  4. E. Berti, Sul carattere dialettico della storiografia filosofica di Aristotele, [in:] Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, a cura di G. Cambiano, Tirrenia Stampatori, Torino 1986, p. 101–125.
  5. H. Cherniss, Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore 1935.
  6. J.M. Cooper, Conclusion – and Retrospect (Metaphysics A 10), [in:] Aristotle's Metaphysics Alpha. Symposium Aristotelicum, Carlos Steel (ed.), with a new critical edition of the Greek text by Oliver Primavesi, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012, p. 335–364.
  7. M. Frede, “Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy,” Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science (1) 2004, p. 9–44.
  8. W.K.C. Guthrie, “Aristotle as a Historian of Philosophy,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies (77) 1957, p. 35–41.
  9. E. Hussey, Aristotle on Earlier Natural Science, [in:] The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, Ch. Shields (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012, p. 17–45.
  10. H. Krämer, “Funktions- und Reflexionsmöglichkeiten der Philosophiehistorie: Vorschläge zu ihrer wissenschaftstheoretischen Ortsbestimmung,” Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie (16) 1985, p. 67–95.
  11. A. Mansion, Le rôle de l'exposé et de la critique des philosophies antérieures chez Aristote, [in:] Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum tenu à Louvain du 24 août au 1er septembre 1960, Lou-vain 1961, p. 35–56.
  12. K. Oehler, “Der Consensus omnium als Kriterium der Wahrheit in der antiken Philosophie und der Patristik. Eine Studie zur Geschichte des Begriffs der Allgemeinen Meinung,” Antike und Abendland (10) 1961, p. 103–129.
  13. J.G. Stevenson, “Aristotle as a Historian of Philosophy,” The Journal of Hellenic Studies (94) 1977, p. 138–143.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.49.2016.920

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/920
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/920/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.