Thinking About End of Life in Teleological Terms

Paolo Biondi, Rachel Haliburton

About author

Dr. Paolo Biondi
Associate Professor and Chair
Department of Philosophy
University of Sudbury
935 Ramsey Lake Road
Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6
CANADA

E-mail: pbiondi@usudbury.ca

About author

Dr. Rachel Haliburton
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
University of Sudbury
935 Ramsey Lake Road
Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6
CANADA

E-mail: rhaliburton@usudbury.ca

Abstract


This brief paper presents an Aristotelian-inspired approach to end-of-life decision making. The account focuses on the importance of teleology, in particular, the telos of eudaimonia understood as the goal of human flourishing as well as the telos of medicine when a person’s eudaimonia is threatened by serious illness and death. We argue that an Aristotelian bioethics offers a better alternative to a “fundamentalist bioethics” since the telos of eudaimonia (i) offers a more realistic conception of the self and the realities of frailty and mortality, (ii) provides a more objective basis for making decisions regarding end-of-life treatment and care, and (iii) is better able to resist the pull of the Technological Imperative. In addition, this teleological concept is flexible enough for it to be employed in multicultural and pluralistic societies.

Full Text:

PDF


References


  1. Aristotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vol., Bollingen Series LXXI, J. Barnes (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 1984.
  2. R. Baker, “A Theory of International Bioethics: Multiculturalism, Postmodernism, and the Bankruptcy of Fundamentalism,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (3) 1998, p. 201–231.
  3. H. Carel, Illness, Acumen, Stocksfield, UK 2008.
  4. A.W. Frank, The Wounded Storyteller, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 1995.
  5. T.M. Garrett, H.W. Baillie, and R.M. Garrett, Health Care Ethics: Principles and Problems, 4th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 1998.
  6. A. Gawande, Being Mortal: Illness, Medicine, and What Matters in the End, Doubleday Canada, Toronto 2014.
  7. R. Haliburton, Autonomy and the Situated Self: A Challenge to Bioethics, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD 2014.
  8. R. Hursthouse, On Virtue Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
  9. A. MacIntyre, After Virtue, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN 1981.
  10. A. MacIntyre, Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues, Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago and La Salle, IL 1999.
  11. T. May, Death, Acumen, Stocksfield, UK 2009.
  12. Plato, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters, Bollingen Series LXXI, E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 1989.
  13. N. Postman, Technopoly: The Surrender Of Culture To Technology, Vintage Books, New York 1992.
  14. S. Schneider (ed.), Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence, Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex 2009.
  15. Agency, “Frankenstein-style human head transplant ‘could happen in two years’,” The Telegraph, Feb. 26, 2015, URL = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11436319/Frankenstein-style-human-head-transplant-could-happen-in-two-years.html [18.06.2015].
  16. J.S. Temel, J.A. Greer, A. Muzikansky, et al., “Early Palliative Care for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine 363 (8) 2010, p. 733–742.
  17. M. Winston, “Children of Invention,” [in:] Society, Ethics, and Technology, 2nd Ed., M. Winston and R. Edelbach (eds.), Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA 2003, p. 1–20.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.45.2015.793

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/793
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/793/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.