Solidarity in the legal frames

Aleksandra Głos

About author

Aleksandra Głos
PhD Candidate
Institute of Philosophy
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
ul. Grodzka 52
31-044 Kraków
Poland

E-mail: olaglos@gmail.com

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to explore the meaning of solidarity and its proper position in the legal frames, with particular focus on health care. Solidarity is often identified with welfare arrangements and social guarantees. In this institutional version, it tends to humiliate citizens and restrict their entrepreneurship. Moreover, administrative solidarity is unable to recognize the actual needs of the most vulnerable members of society, which should be one of its primary concerns. Solidarity, in its original meaning, understood as supportive cooperation of fellow citizens, links their rights and freedoms with mutual duties and responsibilities. Hence, an alternative framework for solidarity should be provided. This framework, committed to the idea of decency, introduces the distinction between the minimum and maximum content of solidarity enforceable by legal means, which should be translated into certain health care practices.

Full Text:

PDF


References


  1. R. Alsop, M. Frost Bertelsen, J. Holland, Empowerment in Practice: From Analysis to Implementation, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington 2006.
  2. B.R. Anderson, Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London 1991.
  3. E.C. Banfield, Moral Basis of a Backward Society, Free Press, Glencoe, IL 1958.
  4. K. Bayertz, Four Uses of ‘Solidarity’, [in:] Solidarity, K. Bayertz (ed.), Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dodrecht 1999, p. 3–29.
  5. M. Bogaert, Y. Denier, I. Devisch, K. Rondia, A Review of the Societal and Ethical Issues, [in:] Justice and Solidarity in Priority Setting in Healthcare. Identifying and Discussing the Ethical and Societal Issues in Resource Allocation, The King Baudouin Foundation and the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics, 2013, p. 87–105.
  6. I. Bohnet, Expressive Law: Framing or Equilibrium Selection?, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper (138); available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=452420 [29.05.2015].
  7. D. Brock, Priority to the Worse Off in Health Care Resource Prioritization, [in:] Medicine and Social Justice, Margaret Battin (ed.), Oxford University Press, New York 2002, p. 373–389.
  8. A. Buchanan, “Justice and Charity,” Ethics 97 (3) 1987, p. 558–575.
  9. J. Buchanan, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, The University of Chicago, Chicago 1975.
  10. A. Buyx, B. Prainsack, Solidarity: Reflections on an Emerging Concept in Bioethics, The Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2011.
  11. A. Buyx, “Personal Responsibility for Health as a Rationing Criterion: Why We Don‘t Like It and Why Maybe We Should,” Journal of Medical Ethics (34) 2008, p. 871–874.
  12. A. Dawson, M. Verweij, “Solidarity: A Moral Concept in Need of Clarification,” Public Health Ethics (5) 2012, p. 1–5.
  13. J. Dean, Solidarity of Strangers: Feminism after Identity Politics, University of California Press, Berkeley 1996.
  14. J. Dixon, J. Frolova, “Existential Poverty: Welfare Dependency, Learned Helplessness and Psychological Capital,” Poverty & Public Policy 3 (2) 2011, p. 1–20.
  15. R. Dworkin, Sovereign Virtue, [in:] The Theory and Practice of Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2000, p. 65–119.
  16. E. Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society, trans. W.D. Halls, New York, Free Press 1997.
  17. D. Fetchenhauer, R. Wittek, Solidarity in the Absence of Ex-ternal Sanctions: A Cross-Cultural Study of Educational Goals and Fair-Share Behavior, [in:] Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives, D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, B. Buunk, S. Lindenberg (eds.), Springer, New York 2006, p. 191–207.
  18. H. Frankfurt, “Equality as a Moral Ideal,” Ethics (98) 1987, p. 21–42.
  19. B.S. Frey, “A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues,” The Economic Journal 107 (443) 1997, p. 1043–1053.
  20. D. Gunson, “Solidarity and the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3) 2009, p. 241–260.
  21. J. Habermas, Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp 1985.
  22. P.S. Harper, “Insurance and Genetic Testing,” Lancet (341) 1993, p. 224–227.
  23. A. Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition: Moral Grammar of Social Con-flicts, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1996.
  24. J. Husted, Insurance, Genetics and Solidarity, [in:] Genetics and Insurance, T. McGleenan, U. Wiesing, F. Ewald (eds.), BIOS, Oxford 1999, p. 1–16.
  25. R. Jaeggi, Solidarity and Indifference, [in:] Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe, R. ter Meulen, W. Arts, R. Muffels (eds.), Springer Science Business Media, Dordrecht 2001, p. 287–307.
  26. K. Kolasa, Optymalna alokacja zasobów w ochronie zdrowia, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2012.
  27. J. Kornai, K. Eggleston, Welfare, Choice, and Solidarity in Transition Welfare. Reforming the Health Sector in Eastern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001.
  28. R. Lofmark, T. Nilstun, A. Bolmsjo, “From Cure to Palliation: Concept, Decision and Acceptance,” Journal of Medical Ethics (33) 2007, p. 685–688.
  29. S. Lukes, Solidarity and Citizenship, [in:] Solidarity, K. Bayertz (ed.), Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dodrecht 1999, p. 271–281.
  30. A. Margalit, The Decent Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  31. A. Margalit, “Decent Equality and Freedom: A Postscript,” Social Research (64) 1997, p. 147–160.
  32. NCoB, Biofuels: Ethical Issues, 2011; available at: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/07/Biofuels_ethical_issues_FULL-REPORT_0.pdf [29.05.2015].
  33. L. Pepall, D. Richards, J. Straub, M. DeBartolo, Crowding Out and Competition in Religious Marketplace, Economics Department, Tufts University 2006.
  34. B. Prainsack, Taking Solidarity Seriously – Can It Help?, [in:] Justice and Solidarity in priority Setting in Healthcare. Identifying and Discussing the Ethical and Societal Issues in Resource Allocation, The King Baudouin Foundation and the Belgian Advisory Committee on Bioethics, 2013, p. 21–31.
  35. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1971.
  36. R. Rorty, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
  37. H. Schmidt, “Personal Responsibility for Health: Developments Under the German Healthcare Reform,” European Journal of Health Law (14) 2007, p. 241–250.
  38. K. Schuyt, “The Sharing of Risks and the Risks of Sharing: Solidarity and Social Justice in the Welfare State,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1) 1998, p. 297–311.
  39. J.M. Smits, The Good Samaritan in European Private Law; on the Perils of Principles Without a Programme and a Programme for the Future, Inaugural Lecture at Maastricht University 2000; Deventer (Kluwer) 2000; available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=848947 [29.05.2015].
  40. Z. Stawrowski, Solidarność, miłosierdzie, sprawiedliwość; available at: http://skarbsolidarnosci.pl/solidarnosc-milosierdzie-sprawiedliwosc-prof-zbigniew-stawrowski/ [29.05.2015].
  41. R. Ter Meulen, “How ‘Decent’ Is a Decent Minimum of Health Care?,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (36) 2011, p. 612–623.
  42. R. Ter Meulen, K. Wright, “Family Solidarity and Informal Care: the Case of Care for People with Dementia,” Bioethics (26) 2012, p. 361–368.
  43. R. Titmuss, The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy, LSE Books, London 1970.
  44. J. Triantafillou, Informal Care in the Long-Term Care System European Overview Paper, European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, 2010.
  45. A. de Tocqueville, Memoir on Pauperism, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago 1997.
  46. I. van Hoyweghen, “Taming the Wild Life of Genes by Law? Genes Reconfiguring Solidarity in Private Insurance,” New Genetics & Society 19 (4) 2010, p. 431–455.
  47. J. Waldron, The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999.
  48. J. Waldron, Welfare and the Images of Charity, [in:] J. Waldron, Liberal Rights. Collected Papers 1981–1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993, p. 225–250.
  49. R. Busse (ed.), Poland: Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition, WHO Regional Office for Europe. On behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2011.
  50. W. Załuski, “On the Asymmetry of Values and Duties and Its Implication for Law,” i-lex (16) 2012, p. 153–171.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.44.2015.771

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/771
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/771/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.