Kantian Friendship: Duty and Idea

Victoria S. Wike

About author

Victoria S. Wike, PhD
Professor
Department of Philosophy
Loyola University Chicago
1032 W. Sheridan Rd.
Chicago, IL 60660   USA
vwike@luc.edu

Abstract


Kant commentators have recently begun to pay attention to Kant’s account of friendship. They have asked questions, such as: Is his description of friendship consistent and robust and does it provide an account of friendship that satisfies common intuitions and expectations of friendship? Their answers to these questions have often been negative. At the same time, many of these critics share a common understanding of two basic aspects of Kant’s account of friendship. Kant sees friendship as both a duty and an ideal state. One critic, Patricia Flynn, considers the implications of this dual claim. She argues that the view that friendship is both duty and idea gives rise to a tension in the concept of friendship. This tension makes the duty of friendship different from all other Kantian moral duties and leaves us with a duty that we cannot achieve. My aim is to revisit Flynn’s argument and by reassessing Kant’s claims to show that there is indeed complexity in Kant’s understanding of friendship, but there is no conceptual problem that makes friendship a duty unlike all other duties or makes it an impossible duty.

Full Text:

PDF


References


  1. KpV – Critique of Practical Reason, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  2. Gr – Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  3. MS – Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M.J. Gregor, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  4. LE – Moral philosophy: Collins’s lecture notes; Morality according to Prof. Kant: Mrongovius’s second set of lecture notes(selections); Notes on the lectures of Mr. Kant on the metaphysics of morals: Vigilantius notes, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997.
  5. Rel – Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. A.W. Wood and G. Di Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
  6. S. Anderson-Gold, Unnecessary Evil: History and Moral Progress in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, SUNY Press, Albany 2001.
  7. M. Baron, Kantian Ethics and Claims of Detachment, [in:] R. Schott (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park 1997, pp. 145–172.
  8. M. Baron, Friendship, Duties Regarding Specific Conditions of Persons, and the Virtues of Social Intercourse (TL 6: 468-474), [in:] O. Sensen, A. Trampota, J. Timmermann (eds.), Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: A Comprehensive Commentary, De Gruyter, Berlin 2013, pp. 365–382.
  9. L.W. Beck, A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1960.
  10. L. Denis, From Friendship to Marriage: Revising Kant, “Philosophy and Phenomenological Research” (63) 2001, pp. 1–28.
  11. P. Flynn, Honesty and Intimacy in Kant’s Duty of Friendship, “International Philosophical Quarterly” (47) 2007, pp. 417–424.
  12. P. Guyer, Kantian Communities: The Realm of Ends, The Ethical Community, and the Highest Good, [in:] C. Payne, L. Thorpe (eds.), Kant and the Concept of Community, University of Rochester Press, Rochester 2011, pp. 88–137.
  13. R.N. Johnson, Self-Improvement: An Essay in Kantian Ethics, Oxford University Press, New York 2011.
  14. I. Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  15. I. Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  16. I. Kant, Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  17. I. Kant, Moral philosophy: Collins’s lecture notes, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997.
  18. I. Kant, Morality according to Prof. Kant: Mrongovius’s second set of lecture notes (selections), trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997.
  19. I. Kant, Notes on the lectures of Mr. Kant on the metaphysics of morals: Vigilantius notes, trans. P. Heath, [in:] I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997.
  20. I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. A.W. Wood and P. Guyer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
  21. I. Kant, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. A.W. Wood and G. Di Giovanni, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
  22. R. Langton, Duty and Desolation, “Philosophy: The Journal of the British Institute of Philosophical Studies” (67) 1992, pp. 481–505.
  23. S. Marcucci, “Moral Friendship” in Kant, “Kant-Studien” (90) 1999, pp. 434–441.
  24. J.G. Murphy, The Highest Good as Content for Kant’s Ethical Formalism, “Kant-Studien” (56) 1965, pp. 102–110.
  25. E. O’Connell, Happiness Proportioned to Virtue: Kant and the Highest Good, “Kantian Review” (17) 2012, pp. 257–279.
  26. H.J. Paton, Kant on Friendship. “Proceedings of the British Academy” rpt., [in:] N. Badhwar (ed.), Friendship: A Philosophical Reader, Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1993, pp. 133–154.
  27. A. Reath, Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant, “Journal of the History of Philosophy” (26) 1988, pp. 593–619.
  28. J.R. Silber, Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good as Immanent and Transcendent, “Philosophical Review” (68) 1959, pp. 460–492.
  29. S. Van Impe, Kant on Friendship, “International Journal of Arts and Sciences” (4) 2011, pp. 127–139.
  30. A. Veltman, Aristotle and Kant on Self-Disclosure in Friendship, “The Journal of Value Inquiry” (38) 2004, pp. 225–239.
  31. A. Villarán, Overcoming the Problem of Impossibility in Kant’s Idea of the Highest Good, “Journal of Philosophical Research” (38) 2013, pp. 27–41.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.39.2014.569

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/569
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/569/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.