Univocity and Analogy: A Comparative Study of Gilbert Ryle and Martin Heidegger

Joshua Harris

About author

Joshua Harris
Trinity Western University
email|: Joshualeeharris0@gmail.com


The work of Gilbert Ryle maintains a notable proximity to the philosophical disposition assumed by the phenomenology of Martin Heidegger. This is due largely to their critiques of the Cartesian tradition of philosophical anthropology. By employing the metaphysical positions of univocity and analogy as a hermeneutical device, this study attempts to draw out the fundamental differences between the projects of Ryle and Heidegger. It is my contention that Ryle is not a phenomenologist precisely because he affirms the Scotist doctrine of the univocity of being. In contrast, Heidegger is a phenomenologist precisely because he disaffirms univocity in favor of a modified version of Thomistic analogy. By recalling this important debate in medieval metaphysics, it is possible to gain important resources for debate between the “analytic” and “continental” camps – at least insofar as those labels correspond to the figures of Ryle and Heidegger in a meaningful way.

Full Text:



  1. Aristotle, The Metaphysics, Penguin Classics, New York 1999.
  2. James Baillie, Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Pearson, New York 2002.
  3. Olivier Boulnois, Reading Duns Scotus: From History to Philosophy, “Modern Theology” (21:4) 2005.
  4. Nevia Docini, The Analytic/Continental Divide: Entities and Being, “Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies” (16) 2007.
  5. Gary Gutting, Bridging the Analytic-Continental Divide, [in:] The Stone, “The New York Times” (Feb.) 2012.
  6. John Hartland-Swann, The Logical Status of 'Knowing That', “Analysis” (16.5) 1956.
  7. Martin Heidegger, Letter on Humanism, [in:] Basic Writings, Harper Collins, New York 1993.
  8. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY 1996.
  9. Martin Heidegger, Duns Scotus’ Theory of the Categories and of Meaning, Depaul University, Chicago, IL 1973.
  10. David Hume, A Treatise on Human Nature, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1978.
  11. Levinas, Meaning and Sense, [in:] From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 2003.
  12. William Lyons, Gilbert Ryle: An Introduction to his Philosophy, Humanities Press, New Jersey 1980.
  13. Michael Murray, Heidegger and Ryle: Two Versions of Phenomenology, “The Review of Metaphysics,” (27.1) 1973.
  14. Catherine Pickstock, Duns Scotus: His Historical and Contemporary Significance, “Modern Theology,” (21.4) 2005.
  15. Jane Roland, On Knowing How and Knowing That, “The Philosophical Re- view” (67.3) 1958.
  16. Gilbert Ryle, Sein und Zeit by Martin Heidegger, “Mind,” (38.151) 1929.
  17. Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson & Co., London 1949.
  18. John Searle, Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida, “Glyph,” (1) 1977.
  19. Thomas Sheehan, Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ 2010.
  20. Richard Swinburne, The Coherence of Theism, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1977.
  21. Iain Thomson, Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’s Destruktion of Metaphysics, (8.3) 2000.
  22. Philip Tonner, Heidegger, Metaphysics, and the Univocity of Being, Continuum, New York 2010.
  23. Jens Zimmermann, Incarnational Humanism: A Philosophy of Culture for the Church in the World, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL 2012.
  24. Slavoj Zizek, and John Milbank, The Monstrosity of Christ, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2009.



Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/497
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/497/en


All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.