On the research ethics

Włodzimierz Galewicz

Abstract


Research ethics may be understood as the part of normative ethics that considers the ethical aspects of research activity. The basic task of this discipline is the formulation of ethics rules. The most general rules of this sort are principles of good research practice, which can be divided into three groups. The first are rules of research uprightness, which include not only honesty (excluding such practices as the fabrication of data, the falsification of results, and plagiarism), but also conscientiousness. The second group consists of rules of loyalty toward the research participants, and includes conscious consent, the minimalization of risk, and fairness in the choice of human subjects. The third group contains the rules of research result utility, which impose upon the scientist responsibility not only for the immediate effects and results of his research, but also their further consequences, connected with the social use of these results. Finally, I consider the problem of the area of competence of so-called bioethical commissions that evaluate medical research projects which use human subjects and emphasize that these commissions ought to take into account all of the three groups of principles of good research practice, not only the rules of loyalty toward the research participants.

Full Text:

PDF (In Polish)


References


  1. The Belmont Report, Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, April 18, 1979; http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm
  2. Dobre obyczaje w nauce. Zbiór zasad i wytycznych wydany przez Komitet Etyki w Nauce przy Prezydium Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Warszawa 1994; http://www.umed.lodz.pl/pl/doc/bio/dobre_obyczaje.doc
  3. D. Nelkin, Forbidden Research: Limits to Inquiry in the Social Sciences, w: E. Erwin, S. Gendin, L. Kleinman (red.), Ethical Issues in Scientific Research. An Anthology, Garland Publishing, New York & London 1994.
  4. H.K. Schachman, What is misconduct in science?, „Science” 261 (1993): 148-9; przedr. w: D. Elliot, J.E. Stern (red.), Research Ethics. A Reader, University Press of New England, 1997.
  5. C. Whitbeck, Research Ethics, w: Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, t. 3, red. R. Chadwick, Academic Press, San Diego 1998.
  6. T.M. Zielonka, Na marginesie Kodeksu Etyki Lekarskiej, „Gazeta Lekarska” 2002-05;
  7. http://www.nil.org.pl/xml/nil/gazeta/numery/n2002/n200205/n20020515

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.19.2009.330

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/330
Polish abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/330/pl
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/330/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.