The Economics of Altruism: On the Rationality of Prosocial Behaviour (in Polish)

Magdalena Adamus

About author

Magdalena Adamus, PhD
Institute of Experimental Psychology
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Dúbravská cesta 9
841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

E-mail: lena.adamus@gmail.com

Abstract


This paper presents considerations on altruism and prosocial behaviour formulated on the basis of some experiments with the ultimatum game. In the first part it will discuss relations between expected utility theories, the characteristics of homo oeconomicus and a modern understanding of altruism. It will focus in particular on conceptual differences, indicating that we can find more than one definition of altruism in modern literature. The second part of the text will provide an overview of selected behavioural theories of prosocial behaviour. It will also present the manner in which needs, social determinants, norms, and individual psychological features affect the propensity to behave in a prosocial fashion.


Full Text:

PDF (In Polish)


References


  1. Aguiar F., Brañas-Garza P., Miller L.M. (2008), Moral distance in dictator games, „Judgment and Decision Making” 3 (4): 344–354.
  2. Akerlof G.A. (2002), Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behavior, „The American Economic Review” 92 (3): 411–433.
  3. Akerlof G.A., Kranton R.E. (2000), Economics and Identity, „The Quaterly Journal of Economics” 115 (3): 715–753.
  4. Akerlof G.A., Kranton R.E. (2010), Identity Economics. How our identities shape our work, wages, and well-being, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  5. Andreoni J., Bernheim B.D. (2009), Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects, „Econometrica” 77 (5): 1607–1636.
  6. Ariely D., Bracha A., Meier S. (2009), Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivations and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially, „American Economic Review” 99 (1): 544–555.
  7. Bénabou R., Tirole J. (2003), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, „Review of Economic Studies” 70: 489–520.
  8. Bénabou R., Tirole J. (2006), Incentives and Prosocial Behavior, „The American Economic Review” 96 (5): 1652–1678.
  9. Blount S. (1995), When Social Outcomes Aren’t Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preferences, „Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes” 63 (2): 131–144.
  10. Bolton G.E., Ockenfels A. (2000), ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition, „The American Economic Review” 90 (1): 166–193.
  11. Bolton G.E., Ockenfels A. (2005), A stress test of fairness measures in models of social utility, „Economic Theory” 25: 957–982.
  12. Brañas-Garza P. (2006), Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity, „Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 60: 306–320.
  13. Burnham T.C. (2003), Engineering altruism: a theoretical and experimental investigating of anonimity and gift giving, „Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 50: 133–144.
  14. Burnham T.C., McCabe K., Smith V.L. (2000), Friend-or foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game, „Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 43: 57–73.
  15. Camerer C. (1997), Progress in Behavioral Game Theory, „The Journal of Economic Perspectives” 11 (4): 167–188.
  16. Camerer C. (2003), Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  17. Camerer C., Loewenstein G. (2002), Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future, [w:] Advances in Behavioral Economics, C. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, M. Rabin (red.), Princeton University Press, Princeton: 3–51.
  18. Charness G., Rabin M. (2002), Understanind social preferences with simple tests, „The Quaterly Journal of Economics” 8: 817–869.
  19. Cherry T.L., Frykblom P., Shogren J.F. (2002), Hardnose the Dictator, „The American Economic Review” 92 (4): 1218–1221.
  20. Consilk J. (1996), Why Bounded Rationality?, „Journal of Economic Literature” 34 (2): 669–700.
  21. Damasio A. (1999), Błąd Kartezjusza. Emocje, rozum i ludzki mózg, tłum. M. Karpiński, Dom Wydawniczy Rebis, Poznań 1999.
  22. Dixit A.K, Nalebuff B.J. (2009), Sztuka strategii. Teoria gier w biznesie i życiu prywatnym, tłum. D. Gasper, MT Biznes, Warszawa.
  23. Eckel C.C., Grossman P.J. (1996), The relative of fairness: gender differences in punishment game, „Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 30: 143–158.
  24. Eckel C.C., Grossman P.J. (1996), Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games, „Games and Economic Behavior” 16: 181–191.
  25. Edgeworth F.Y. (1881), Mathematical Psychics. An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences, C. Kegan Paul & Co., Londyn.
  26. Elster J. (1998), Emotions and Economic Theory, „Journal of Economic Literature” 36 (1): 47–74.
  27. Falk A., Fehr E., Fischbacher U. (2003), On the nature of fair behavior, „Economic Inquiry” 41 (1): 20–26.
  28. Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. (1999), Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation, „The Quaterly Joournal of Economics” 5: 817–868.
  29. Forsythe R., Horowitz J.L., Savin N.E. (1994), Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments, „Games and Economic Behavior” 6 (3): 347–369.
  30. Frohlich N., Oppenheimer J., Moore J.B. (2001), Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: the costs of anonymity, „Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 46: 271–290.
  31. Gauthier D. (1974), The Impossibility of Rational Egoism, „The Journal of Philosophy” 71 (14): 439–456.
  32. Gauthier D. (1975), Reason and Maximization, „Canadian Journal of Philosophy” 4 (3): 411–433.
  33. Gauthier D. (1986), Morals by Agreement, Oxford University Press, New York.
  34. Gintis H. (2009), The Bounds of Reason. Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2009.
  35. Guala F., Mittone L. (2010), Paradigmatic experiments: The Dictator Game, „The Journal of Socio-Economics” 39 (5): 578–584.
  36. Güth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. (1982), An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, „Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization” 3 (4): 367–388.
  37. Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H., McElreath R. (2001), In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies, „American Economic Review” 91 (2): 73–78.
  38. Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H. (2004), Foundations of Human Sociality. Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies, Oxford University Press, Nowy Jork.
  39. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. (2010), The weirdest people in the world?, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 33 (2–3): 61–135.
  40. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Smith V.L. (1996), Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games, „The American Economic Review” 86 (3): 653–660.
  41. Ingram J.K. (1888), A History of Political Economy, Adam & Charles Black, London.
  42. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. (1986), Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics, „Journal of Business” 59 (4): 285–300.
  43. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. (1986), Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market, „The American Economic Review” 76 (4): 728–741.
  44. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979), Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, „Econometrica” 47 (2): 263–291.
  45. Kuniński M. (2010), Sprawiedliwość globalna: szlachetny ideał czy rzetelna teoria?, „Diametros” 26: 136–153.
  46. Meier S. (2007), A Survey of Economics Theories and Field Evidence on Pro-Social Behavior, [w:] Economics and Psychology. A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field, B.S. Frey, A. Stutzer (red.), The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA): 51–88.
  47. Mill J.S. (1836), On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It, London and Westminister Review.
  48. Mittone L., Ploner M. (2012), Asset Legitimacy and Distributive Justice in the Dictator Game: An Experimental Analysis, „Journal of Behavioral Decision Making” 25 (2): 135–142.
  49. Mullainathan S., Thaler R.H. (2000), Behavioral economics, „NBER Working Paper Series” 7948, The National Bureau of Economic Research: 1–13.
  50. Nagel T. (1970), The Possibility of Altruism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  51. Persky J. (1995), Retrospectives: The Ethology of Homo Economicus, „Journal of Economic Perspective” 9 (2): 221–231.
  52. Polowczyk J. (2010), Elementy ekonomii behawioralnej w dziełach Adama Smitha, „Ekonomista” 4: 493–522.
  53. Rabin M. (1993), Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics, „The American Economic Review” 83 (5): 1281–1302.
  54. Rabin M. (1998), Psychology and Economics, „Journal of Economic Literature” 36 (1): 11–46.
  55. Rabin M. (2002), A perspective on psychology and economics, „European Economic Review” 46 (4–5): 657–685.
  56. Rawls J. (2009), Teoria sprawiedliwości, tłum. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
  57. Ruffle B.J. (1998), More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games, „Games and Economic Behavior” 23 (2): 247–265.
  58. Sachs J.L., Mueller U.G., Wilcox T.P., Bull J.J. (2004), The evolution of cooperation, „The Quaterly Review of Biology” 79 (2): 135–160.
  59. Sally D., Hill E. (2006), The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory of mind, cooperation and fairness, „Journal of Economic Psychology” 27 (1): 73–97.
  60. Sen A. (1977), Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 6 (4): 317–344.
  61. Sen A. (2009), The Idea of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  62. Simon H. (1955), A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice, „The Quaterly Journal of Economics” 69 (1): 99–118.
  63. Smith A. (1989), Teoria uczuć moralnych, tłum. D. Petsch, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
  64. Solek A. (2010), Ekonomia behawioralna a ekonomia neoklasyczna, „Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego” 8: 21–34.
  65. Szarzec K. (2014), Model homo oeconomicus w teorii makroekonomii głównego nurtu, [w:] Dokonania współczesnej myśli ekonomicznej: racjonalność, efektywność, etyka, U. Zagóra-Jonszta, R. Pęciak (red.), Wydawnictwo EU w Katowicach, Katowice: 195–204.
  66. Thaler R.H. (2000), From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens, „Journal of Economic Perspectives” 14 (1): 133–141.
  67. Zabdyr-Jamróz M. (2015), The Veil of Ignorance and Solidarity in Healthcare: Finding Compassion in the Original Position, „Diametros” 43: 79–95.
  68. Zizzo D.J. (2011), Do Dictator Games Measure Altruism?, „CBESS Discussion Paper” 11–15: 1–9.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.1233

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/1233
Polish abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/1233/pl
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/1233/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.