Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Self-Expression, and Kant’s Public Use of Reason
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article turns to early modern and Enlightenment advocates of tolerance (Locke, Spinoza, John Stuart Mill) in order to discover and lay bare the line of argument that informed their commitment to free speech. This line of argument will subsequently be used to assess the shift from free speech to the contemporary ideal of free self-expression. In order to take this assessment one step further, this article will finally turn to Immanuel Kant’s famous defense of the public use of reason. In the wake of Katerina Deligiorgi’s readings of Kant, it will show that the idea of free speech requires a specific disposition on behalf of speakers and writers that is in danger of being neglected in the contemporary prevailing conception of free speech as freedom of self-expression.
Downloads
Article Details
By submitting his/her work to the Editorial Board, the author accepts, upon having his/her text recommended for publication, that Diametros applies the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to the works we publish. Under this license, authors agree to make articles legally available for reuse, without permission or fees. Anyone may read, download, copy, print, distribute or reuse these articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as the author and original source are properly cited. The author holds the copyright without any other restrictions. Full information about CC-BY: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
References
Arendt H. (1978), The Life of the Mind, Harcourt, San Diego.
Ash T.G. (2016), Free Speech, Atlantic Books, London.
Deligiorigi K. (2005), Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment, SUNY Press, New York.
Kant I. (1781–87/1998), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. A.W. Wood, P. Guyer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant I. (1784/1996), An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?, trans. M.J. Gregor, [in:] I. Kant, Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 11–22.
Kant I. (1786/1996), What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?, trans. A. Wood, [in:] I. Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 7–20.
Kant I. (1790/2000), Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. P. Guyer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kant I. (1798/2007), Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. R.B. Louden, [in:] I. Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 227-429.
Locke J. (1991), A Letter Concerning Toleration in Focus, J. Horton, S. Mendus (eds.), Routledge, London and New York.
Mill J.S. (1929), On Liberty, Watts & Co., London.
O’Neill O. (2013), “From Toleration to Freedom of Expression,” URL = https://www.giffordlectures.org/lectures/toleration-freedom-expression [accessed 31.8.2017].
O’Neill O. (2015), Constructing Authorities. Reason, Politics and Interpretation in Kant’s Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Scanlon T.M. (2003), The Difficulty of Tolerance. Essays in Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Schwartz R.M. (2012), “Truth, Free Speech, and the Legacy of John Milton’s Areopagitica,” Teoria 32: 47–58.
Spinoza B. (1989), Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, trans. S. Shirley, Brill, Leiden.
Van Mill D. (2017), “Freedom of Speech,” URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freedom-speech/ [accessed 8.11.2017].