Global Duties in the Face of Uncertainty

Sylvie Loriaux

About author

Sylvie Loriaux, Assistant Professor
Université Laval - Laval University
Département de science politique  - Department of Political Science
Pavillon Charles-De Koninck
1030, avenue des Sciences-Humaines, local 4461
Québec G1V 0A6
Canada

Email: sylvie.loriaux@pol.ulaval.ca

Abstract


This paper aims to highlight the role played by uncertainties in global justice theories. It will start by identifying four kinds of uncertainties that could potentially have an impact on the nature, content and very existence of global duties: first, uncertainties regarding the causes of global injustices; second, uncertainties regarding the consequences of global justice initiatives; third, uncertainties pertaining to the 'imperfect' character of certain global duties; and fourth, uncertainties regarding the conduct of others. It will discuss each of these uncertainties in turn, with particular attention to their normative implications, their distinctively 'global' source, and the possibility of their being addressed. It will conclude with some reflections on how the normative issues raised by uncertainties related to spatial distance compare to those raised by uncertainties related to temporal distance.

Full Text:

PDF


References


  1. Bagnoli C. (2006), Humanitarian Intervention as a Perfect Duty: A Kantian Argument, [in:] Humanitarian Intervention, T. Nardin, M. Williams (eds), Nomos XLVII, New York University Press, New York: 1–28.
  2. Barry C. (2005), Understanding and Evaluating the Contribution Principle, [in:] Real World Justice: Grounds, Principles, Human Rights, and Social Institutions, A. Follesdal, T. Pogge (eds), Springer, Dordrecht: 103–138.
  3. Beitz C. (1999), Political Theory and International Relations, rev. ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  4. Brennan G. (2007), “Discounting the Future, Yet Again,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 6 (3): 259–284.
  5. Buchanan A., Keohane R. (2006), “The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions,” Ethics & Public Affairs 20 (4): 405-437.
  6. Buchanan A. (2000), “Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World,” Ethics 110 (4): 697–721.
  7. Cowen T., Parfit D. (1992) Against the Social Discount Rate, [in:] Justice between Age Groups and Generations, P. Laslett, J. Fishkin (eds), Yale University Press, New Haven: 144–161.
  8. Courtois S. (2008), “L’intervention humanitaire peutelle être conçue comme un «devoir parfait»,” Dialogue 47 (2): 291–310.
  9. Feinberg J. (1973), Social Philosophy, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ).
  10. Goodin R. (1982), “Discounting Discounting,” Journal of Public Policy 2 (1): 53–71.
  11. Hobbes T. (1991), Leviathan, R. Tuck (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Horton K. (2010), “Aid Agencies: The Epistemic Question,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1): 29–43.
  13. Ignatieff M. (2001), Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry, A. Gutmann (ed.), Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ).
  14. James A. (2005), “Distributive Justice Without Sovereign Rule: the Case of Trade,” Social Theory & Practice 31 (4): 533–559.
  15. Jamieson D. (2005), “Duties to the Distant: Aid, Assistance, and Intervention in the Developing World,” The Journal of Ethics 9 (1–2): 151–170.
  16. Kant I. (1996), Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. M. Gregor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  17. Loriaux S., Herwig A. (2014), “International Trade, Fairness, and Labour Migration,” Moral Philosophy & Politics 1 (2): 289–313.
  18. Loriaux S. (2014), “Deception, Right, and International Relations: a Kantian Reading,” European Journal of Political Theory 13 (2): 199–217.
  19. Mueller D. (1974), “Intergenerational Justice and the Social Discount Rate,” Theory & Decision 5 (3): 263–273.
  20. Nardin T. (2006), Introduction, [in:] Humanitarian Intervention, T. Nardin, M. Williams (eds), New York University Press, New York: 1–28.
  21. O’Neill O. (1986), Faces of Hunger. An Essay on Poverty, Justice, and Development, G. Allen & Unwin, London.
  22. O’Neill O. (2005), “The Dark Side of Human Rights,” International Affairs 81 (2): 427–439.
  23. Pattison J. (2010), Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  24. Pogge T. (2005), “Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties,” Ethics & International Affairs 19 (1): 55–83.
  25. Risse M. (2005), “Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?” Ethics & International Affairs 19 (1): 9–18.
  26. Roff H. (2013), Global justice, Kant, and the Responsibility to Protect: A Provisional Duty, Routledge, London.
  27. Rosen A.D. (1993), Kant’s Theory of Justice, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
  28. Satz D. (2005), “What Do We Owe the Global Poor?,” Ethics & International Affairs 19 (1): 47–54.
  29. Scheffler S. (2001), Boundaries and Allegiances, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  30. Shue H. (1996), Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton (NJ).
  31. Singer P. (1972), “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3): 229–243.
  32. Tan K.-C. (2006), The Duty to Protect, [in:] Humanitarian Intervention, T. Nardin, M. Williams (eds), New York University Press, New York: 84–116.
  33. Thompson D. (2010), “Representing Future Generations: Political Presentism and Democratic Trusteeship,” Critical Review of International and Political Philosophy 13 (1): 17–37.
  34. Wenar L. (2003), “What We Owe to Distant Others,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2 (3): 283–304.
  35. Wenar L. (2010) Poverty is no Pond: Challenges for the Affluent, [in:] Giving Well: The Ethics of Philanthropy, P. Illingworth, T. Pogge, L. Wenar (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford: 104–132.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.53.0.1102

Article links:

Default URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/1102
English abstract URL: http://www.diametros.iphils.uj.edu.pl/index.php/diametros/article/view/1102/en

Share:






All works are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.